Connect with us
Avatar

Published

on

Zak began the interview by accusing van der Veen’s usage of the term “insurrection” as contradicting his prior statements about the January Capitol breach.

Sure, I used the word ‘insurrection’ in my closing argument when closing the charging documents,” replied Trump’s attorney. “What happened at the Capitol on January 6 is absolutely horrific. But what happened at the Capitol during this trail was not too far away from that. The prosecutors in this case doctored evidence. They did not investigate this case and when they had to come to the court of the Senate to put their case on, they hadn’t done any investigation. They doctored evidence.”

The CBS host followed up with a question about van der Veen’s reference to doctored evidence by the prosecution, attempting to trivialize it.

To be clear for our viewers, what you’re talking about is a checkmark that’s a verification on Twitter that did not exist on that particular tweet, a 2020 that should have actually read 2021, and the selective editing, you say, of the tapes,” Zak said. “Is that the doctored evidence of what you’re speaking?

This ridiculous comment pushed the interview off the rails, as Trump’s attorney called her out for attempting to portray the doctoring of evidence in an impeachment trial as of little significance.

Van der Veen then went on to own Zak, demonstrating media malfeasance in covering the impeachment.

Ma’am, your question is turned. What has to happen, the media has to start telling the right story in this country. The media is trying to divide the country. You are bloodthirsty for ratings, and as such, you’re asking questions now that are already set up with a fact pattern. I can’t believe you would ask me a question indicating that it’s all right just to doctor a little bit of evidence. There’s more stuff that we uncovered that they doctored, to be frank with you, and perhaps that will come out one day. …

Advertisement
Follow us on Parler For Uncut Raw uncensored content!

What I’m telling you is that they doctored evidence, and I believe your question says, ‘Well, it’s only a Twitter check and changing a year of date here.’ They switched the date of a Twitter a year to try to connect it to this case. That’s not a small thing. ma’am. The other thing they did is they put a check mark on something to make it look like it was a validated account when it wasn’t. And when they were caught, they didn’t say anything about it. They didn’t even try to come up with an excuse about it. And that’s not the way our prosecutors or our government officials should be conducting themselves.

And the media shouldn’t be letting them get away with it, either. I’m tired of the biased media on both sides, left and right. What this country wants, what this country needs, is this country to come together; to take the left and the right and find a middle ground and start responsibly being our public officials, our elected officials. And one of the reasons why they do it is because of the media. Because the media want to tell their narrative, rather than just telling it is. And frankly, I’m tired of it. I’m not in front of your cameras all the time, but what I’ve been subjected to this last week 

At the end of the interview, van der Veen tossed his microphone aside and walked off the camera, while Zak looked flushed.

The media’s disdain for facts and preference for their own truth lives on.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments

Capitol riot

FBI release videos of assaults on officers at US Capitol, asking for help identifying suspects

Avatar

Published

on

The FBI released new videos and details Thursday on “the most egregious assault on federal officers” during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and asked the public to help identify suspects.

The agency is “asking for the public’s help in identifying 10 individuals suspected of being involved in some of the most violent attacks on officers who were protecting the U.S. Capitol and our democratic process on January 6,” said Steven M. D’Antuono, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office in a statement.

Multiple videos show suspects attacking police officers with their fists, clubs and even devices that appear to be baton stun guns or cattle prods.

“These individuals are seen on video committing egregious crimes against those who have devoted their lives to protecting the American people,” D’Antuono said.

The agency released 10 videos detailing each incident and suspect, including pictures of their face and where they were in the Capitol during the riot.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Follow us on Parler For Uncut Raw uncensored content!

The videos come on the same day a grand jury indicted two men on 10 counts in connection with assaulting U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died the day of the riot after being attacked by the intruders.

The men were arrested and charged last week for allegedly assaulting Sicknick and other officers with bear spray during the riot.

Charges against Julian Khater, of Pennsylvania, and George Tanios, of West Virginia, include conspiracy to injure officers, assault on federal officers and civil disorder, according to ABC News.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Capitol riot

Judicial Watch’s Fitton challenging Capitol Police to disclose info about Jan. 6 Capitol breach

Avatar

Published

on

Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton said Friday that he is challenging an attempt by the U.S. Capitol Police to withhold information regarding the Jan. 6 Capitol breach.

“Were challenging their refusal to disclose this information,” Fitton said about his conservative watchdog group’s attempt to access documents the government has regarding the specifics of of the incident.

Fitton said the police officials don’t think they should have to release their documents, including records and email conversations to the public.

“I think they have information they don’t want to share because it is potentially harmful to whatever narratives we’re hearing out of the Pelosi Congress,” Fitton told show host Sophie Mann.

In the roughly five weeks since the deadly riot, members or Congress, the news media and others have tried with limited success to learn the exact sequence of events before and during the the overrunning of the Capitol — including who did or did not authorize National Guard assistance and who knew what intelligence in advance of the breach on the Capitol Building. 

Advertisement

Advertisement
Follow us on Parler For Uncut Raw uncensored content!

Fitton said he hopes to get specific details about “who said what about getting security,” as well as possible videos of the events such as the fatal shooting of one protester within the Capitol.

“Congress thinks it’s answerable to no one,” Fitton said. “And [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi is ultimately responsible for this along with [Senate Majority Leader] Chuck Schumer, this secrecy and obstruction.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Antifa

FBI ‘can’t find proof’ of Antifa involvement in Jan. 6 protests despite mountains of video evidence

Avatar

Published

on

By

The director of the FBI, Chris Wray, told the Senate he hasn’t seen any proof of Antifa’s involvement in the January 6 protests. However, not only is there ample evidence of Antifa’s role, but the FBI itself has also charged one of its members for inciting violence at the U.S. Capitol that day. One America’s Pearson Sharp explains.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Most Popular

Copyright © 2020 King Trump Fovever.